As clearly stated by the Conference’s proposal, after a decade of European urban and spatial policies, it seems the time now for a deeper reflection on their influences in spatial and urban planning practices in the EU countries. A brief survey on what concerns Italy allows us to observe that EU planning intervention has affected practically all the levels of territorial government, through many dimensions of what is first and foremost a material innovation, triggered as if by contamination by the arrival on the scene of the new institutional player. Changes are mainly visible in: – the shaping of spatial frameworks for planning policies; – the proliferation of new, different tools for regional and urban planning; – a progressive re-equilibrium between “central” and “peripheral” regions; – new institutional and administrative attitudes to negotiation and partnership; – the cultural way of treating urban problems and conceiving planning; – new emerging competences and “jobs” for planners. A reflection on the deepest meaning of those many changes – and, more generally, on the substantial reasons of the (not institutionalised) EU intervention in planning policies – could contribute to better understanding on what, not only in Italy, can be expected from EU planning and what, consequently, can be improved in European development strategies.

Whatever happened to planning? Italy after EU intervention / JANIN RIVOLIN YOCCOZ, Umberto. - ELETTRONICO. - (2002), pp. 1-14. (Intervento presentato al convegno Urban and spatial European policies: levels of territorial government tenutosi a Torino (Italy) nel 18-20 aprile 2002).

Whatever happened to planning? Italy after EU intervention

JANIN RIVOLIN YOCCOZ, Umberto
2002

Abstract

As clearly stated by the Conference’s proposal, after a decade of European urban and spatial policies, it seems the time now for a deeper reflection on their influences in spatial and urban planning practices in the EU countries. A brief survey on what concerns Italy allows us to observe that EU planning intervention has affected practically all the levels of territorial government, through many dimensions of what is first and foremost a material innovation, triggered as if by contamination by the arrival on the scene of the new institutional player. Changes are mainly visible in: – the shaping of spatial frameworks for planning policies; – the proliferation of new, different tools for regional and urban planning; – a progressive re-equilibrium between “central” and “peripheral” regions; – new institutional and administrative attitudes to negotiation and partnership; – the cultural way of treating urban problems and conceiving planning; – new emerging competences and “jobs” for planners. A reflection on the deepest meaning of those many changes – and, more generally, on the substantial reasons of the (not institutionalised) EU intervention in planning policies – could contribute to better understanding on what, not only in Italy, can be expected from EU planning and what, consequently, can be improved in European development strategies.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EURA2002%20Janin%20Rivolin%20final.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 1. Preprint / submitted version [pre- review]
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 62.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
62.67 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/1625423
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo