Adhesive bonding of overlapping coaxial tubes of either conventional or composite materials is a joining solution often encountered in engineering structures. This paper reviews the underlying assumptions and assesses the accuracy of five published theoretical models for the adhesive stresses produced by axial loading of the tubular joint. The models scrutinized are those by Lubkin and Reissner (1956) [1], Shi and Cheng (1993) [3], Nayeb-Hashemi et al.(1997) [4], Pugno and Carpinteri (2003) [5] and Nemeş et al. (2006) [6]. Comparison of the model results with the outcome of ad-hoc finite element analyses on five joint configurations shows that: (1) all models predict correctly the shear stresses; (2) only Lubkin and Reissner's model gives correct peel stress distributions; and (3) the axial and the hoop stresses are close to each other and are about one half of the peel stresses. The usefulness of an explicit closed-form solution, not provided by Lubkin and Reissner's theory, is recognized.

Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints - Part I: Critical review and finite element assessment of published models / Dragoni, Eugenio; Goglio, Luca. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES. - ISSN 0143-7496. - STAMPA. - 47:(2013), pp. 35-45. [10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.009]

Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints - Part I: Critical review and finite element assessment of published models

DRAGONI, EUGENIO;GOGLIO, Luca
2013

Abstract

Adhesive bonding of overlapping coaxial tubes of either conventional or composite materials is a joining solution often encountered in engineering structures. This paper reviews the underlying assumptions and assesses the accuracy of five published theoretical models for the adhesive stresses produced by axial loading of the tubular joint. The models scrutinized are those by Lubkin and Reissner (1956) [1], Shi and Cheng (1993) [3], Nayeb-Hashemi et al.(1997) [4], Pugno and Carpinteri (2003) [5] and Nemeş et al. (2006) [6]. Comparison of the model results with the outcome of ad-hoc finite element analyses on five joint configurations shows that: (1) all models predict correctly the shear stresses; (2) only Lubkin and Reissner's model gives correct peel stress distributions; and (3) the axial and the hoop stresses are close to each other and are about one half of the peel stresses. The usefulness of an explicit closed-form solution, not provided by Lubkin and Reissner's theory, is recognized.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dragoni, Goglio Int J Adhes Adhes 47 (2013) Post-print.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Versione finale dell'autore (bozza accettata)
Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 3.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2516690
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo